Rebuttal, Agreement, Partial Agreement

The heart of debate is the ability to respond to opposing views. Knowing when to fully rebut, fully agree, or partially agree, and expressing each appropriately, is the mark of an expert speaker.

Rebuttal Expressions

When rebutting, point out the flaw in the logic rather than attacking the person. Use patterns such as "κ·Έ λ…Όλ¦¬μ—λŠ” ν•œ κ°€μ§€ λ¬Έμ œκ°€ μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€" (there is one problem with that logic) and "κ·Έ μ£Όμž₯은 ~을 κ°„κ³Όν•˜κ³  μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€" (that argument overlooks...).

κ·Έ μ£Όμž₯은 ν˜„μ‹€μ μΈ λΉ„μš© 문제λ₯Ό κ°„κ³Όν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€κ³  λ΄…λ‹ˆλ‹€.
geu jujangeun hyeonsiljeogin biyong munjereul gangwahago itdago bomnida.
I believe that argument overlooks the practical issue of cost.
κ·Έ λ…Όλ¦¬μ—λŠ” ν•œ κ°€μ§€ 결정적인 ν—ˆμ μ΄ μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.
geu nollie-neun han gaji gyeoljeongjeogin heojeomi itseumnida.
There is one decisive flaw in that logic.
근거둜 μ œμ‹œν•˜μ‹  자료의 μΆœμ²˜κ°€ λΆˆλΆ„λͺ…ν•˜λ‹€κ³  μƒκ°ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€.
geungeoro jesihasin jaryoui chulcheoga bulbunmyeonghadago saenggakhamnida.
I think the source of the data you presented as evidence is unclear.

Agreement Expressions

κ·Έ 점에 λŒ€ν•΄μ„œλŠ” μ „μ μœΌλ‘œ κ³΅κ°ν•˜λ©°, 같은 λ§₯λ½μ—μ„œ ν•œ κ°€μ§€ λ§λΆ™μ΄κ² μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.
geu jeome daehaeseoneun jeonjeogeuro gonggamhamyeo, gateun maengnaegeseo han gaji deotbuchigetseumnida.
I fully agree on that point, and I'd like to add one thing in the same vein.

Partial Agreement

Partial agreement uses concessive clauses such as "~λΌλŠ” 점은 μΈμ •ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€λ§Œ, ~" (I grant that..., but...). It is a polished, cooperative way to hold your ground while conceding part of the point.

κ·Έ μ·¨μ§€μ—λŠ” λ™μ˜ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€λ§Œ, μ‹€ν–‰ λ°©μ‹μ—λŠ” 의문이 λ‚¨μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.
geu chwijieneun donguihamnidaman, sirhaeng bangsigeneun uimuni namseumnida.
I agree with the intent, but I still have doubts about how it would be carried out.
μ›μΉ™μ—λŠ” κ³΅κ°ν•˜λ‚˜, 적용 λ²”μœ„μ— λŒ€ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 이견이 μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.
wonchigeneun gonggamhana, jeogyong beomwie daehaeseoneun igyeoni itseumnida.
I share the principle, but I differ on the scope of its application.

Conceding then Counter-Arguing

Experts first acknowledge the valid part of an opponent's point, then pivot to the core rebuttal. The flow "~은 λΆ„λͺ… λ§žμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. λ‹€λ§Œ ~" (that is certainly true; however...) is the most effective.

μ§€μ ν•˜μ‹  μœ„ν—˜μ€ λΆ„λͺ… λ§žμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. λ‹€λ§Œ κ·Έ λŒ€κ°€κ°€ 더 ν½λ‹ˆλ‹€.
jijeokhasin wiheomeun bunmyeong matseumnida. daman geu daega-ga deo keumnida.
The risk you pointed out is certainly real. However, the cost of inaction outweighs it.
TypeKey Expression
Rebuttal~을 κ°„κ³Όν•˜κ³  μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€ / ~μ—λŠ” λ¬Έμ œκ°€ μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€
Agreementμ „μ μœΌλ‘œ κ³΅κ°ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€ / 같은 μƒκ°μž…λ‹ˆλ‹€
Partial~은 μΈμ •ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€λ§Œ / ~λΌλŠ” μ μ—μ„œλŠ” λ™μ˜ν•˜λ‚˜
Concede-pivot~은 λΆ„λͺ… λ§žμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. λ‹€λ§Œ ~
πŸ’‘ Tip: Partial agreement is one of the most persuasive strategies in debate. Acknowledging the valid part of an opponent's point first lends greater credibility to the rebuttal that follows.
Take the quiz